(713) 546-5045Tap to Call This Lawyer
Professional Experience
- Partner
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
- Current
- Current
- In re Enron CorpCo-lead counsel in most complex Chapter 11 case ever filed. Ms. Gray is the senior litigation counsel responsible for managing and administering the Enron case. Ms. Gray is strategically involved in all aspects of the case, but is primarily responsible for managing the multitude of pending adversary proceedings in which billions of dollars are being sought to be recovered. Ms. Gray also serves as the primary client liaison for the firm. United States v. AMR and American AirlinesMs. Gray played a major role in the government’s antitrust case against American Airlines, in which the government alleged that American Airlines engaged in predatory practices to exclude new entrant airlines from using DFW. Ms. Gray was responsible for third party discovery of many new entrant airlines allegedly excluded from DFW.
- Current
- Counsel Corp. v. Glaxo Corp.Ms. Gray represented Counsel Corp. and its subsidiary, Faro Pharmaceuticals, in connection with their fraud-in-the-inducement case against Glaxo Corp. Ms. Gray was responsible for the defense of Glaxo’s summary judgment and after arguing the summary judgment motion, a settlement was entered into between the parties.
- Current
- In re Viscount AirlinesMs. Gray was lead counsel for GE Aviation Services, Inc., the fleet lessor to Viscount Airlines. In addition to obtaining a recovery for GECAS, Ms. Gray defended against the imposition of millions of dollars in mechanics liens against the fleet. Ms. Gray successfully defended against the application of Arizona’s liberal mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien statute to aircraft repair facilities - an issue of first impression in the state’s appellate court. National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. v. General Electric Credit CorporationMs. Gray represented GECC in connection with its defense of a mortgage foreclosure action against a 400 megawatt coal fired power plant. GECC maintained that the foreclosure violated a contractual “anti-equity squeeze” provision in the project finance documents. Again after successfully arguing against summary judgment in what the CRA claimed to be a “simple foreclosure action,” the parties reached a settlement.
Education
- Syracuse University
- J.D.
-
- SUNY Albany
- B.A.
-
Publications
Speaking Engagements
- Implication of the FERC/Bankruptcy Court Tug of War (New York, January 26, 2004)
- Remote and Special Purpose Entities: Are They in Danger of Collapse? (May 01, 2003) State Bar of Texas Advanced Business Bankruptcy
- What Every Industry Participant Should Know About the Bankruptcy Code (January 01, 2003) Exnet 16th Annual Utility M&A Symposium, Strategic Opportunities In Hard Times
- Corporate Ethics After Sarbanes-Oxley: A Lawyer’s Expanding Role as Corporate Watchdog (Houston, September 01, 2002) American Corporate Counsel Association, Houston Chapter
- Advanced Trial Advocacy Program (University of Houston Law Center, January 26, 2001) Faculty, 1992-1997; 2001
Websites & Blogs
- Website
- Website
Contact & Map
