Timothy DeMasi

Partner

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Current

Current

Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.representing company accused of infringing patent concerning Web site development. Microlinc, LLC v. Intel Corp., et al.representing company accused of infringing patent on computer architecture. VirnetX Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.representing company accused of infringing concerning computer networking. Rembrandt Techs. LP v. ABC, Inc., CBS Corp., NBC Universal, Inc.representing companies accused of infringement based on use of ATSC digital television standard. Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc.representing on appeal company accused of infringing patents concerning equipment used in semiconductor manufacturing. Boston Scientific Corp. v. Conor Medsystems Inc.represented company accused of infringing patent on coronary stents. IP Innovation v. Dell Computer Corp.obtained favorable settlement for company accused of infringing patents relating to the visual quality of an image after filing motion for summary judgement of non-infringement. American Video Graphics, L.P. v. Microsoft Corp.obtained favorable settlement for company accused of infringing 5 patents related to computer graphics following favorable claim construction opinion. Agere Systems, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.obtained favorable settlement in 16 patent case concerning digital communications following favorable claim construction opinion. MOSAID Techs, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.obtained favorable settlement for company accused of infringing 9 patents on DRAM technologies. ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.obtained jury verdict of infringement and no invalidity for owner of patents relating to electrosurgical devices. Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. v. Praxair, Inc.represented on appeal owner of patents concerning equipment used in semiconductor manufacturing. Palomar Medical Techs., Inc. v. Cutera, Inc.represented company accused of infringing patents on laser hair removal. United Epitaxy Co. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.obtained favorable settlement for owner of patent relating to light emitting diodes. Priceline.com Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. and Expedia, Inc.obtained favorable settlement for companies accused of infringing Internet business method patent. In the Matter of Certain Rare-Earth Magnets and Magnetic Materials and Articles Containing Sameobtained general exclusion order for owners of patents on neodymium-iron-boron magnets. Waters Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.successfully moved to dismiss declaratory judgment complaint against owner of patents concerning high performance liquid chromatography. Computer Aid, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.represented company accused of infringing copyright on software for remote monitoring of cable television networks. Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.represented owners of patents on oxycodone. GM Network Ltd. v. e-gold Ltd.represented owner of patent on Internet business method. Dictaphone Corp. v. Nice Systems Ltd.represented owner of patents on digital logger technology. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Nu-kote Int’l, Inc.represented owner of patents relating to inkjet printer technology. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.represented owner of patents concerning inkjet printer technology. PG Distribution, Inc. v. Soundview Techs., Inc.represented company accused of infringing patents on television audio and video signal blanking system. Chiron Corp. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.represented company accused of infringing patents on hepatitis C virus sequences. Enzon, Inc. v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.represented company accused of infringing patents on pegylated alpha interferon. Enzon, Inc. v. Shearwater Polymers, Inc.represented company accused of infringing patents on pegylated alpha interferon.

London School of Economics

LL.M.

1996

University of Notre Dame

J.D.

1991

Lafayette College

1988

B.S.E.E.

Publication