Free Consultation: (704) 512-0606Tap to Call This Lawyer
PREMIUM
Adam M. Seifer

Adam M. Seifer

SeiferFlatow, PLLC
  • DUI & DWI, Criminal Law, Traffic Tickets
  • North Carolina
Review This Lawyer
Lawyer Rating and Reviews
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5.0
Legal Analysis
5.0/5.0
Communication Skills
5.0/5.0
Ethics and Professionalism
5.0/5.0
Robert J. Reeves
Robert J. Reeves October 27, 2019
Rating: 10 Lawyer Rating - 10 out of 10
I have know Adam for several years and have always been very impressed with his legal abilities and him personally.
Badges
Claimed Lawyer ProfileQ&ALII GoldSocial Media
Biography

I have represented clients with diverse legal needs, ranging from those who are accused of serious crimes including Driving While Impaired (DWI) to more serious felonies and who face the loss of liberty if convicted. A large part of my practice focuses on the defense of those who have been accused of committing crimes, especially those accused of DWI/DUI and I have been recognized in this industry by both peers and clients as achieving great results for my clients. I zealously fight to protect his clients’ statutory and Constitutional rights and try to ensure that they do not get railroaded by a system that is supposed to stand for innocence until proven guilty. The daily mission at my Charlotte, North Carolina based law firm of SeiferFlatow, PLLC and that of myself is to help level the playing field for their clients by combining a high level of customer service with aggressive advocacy on their client's behalf. I believe that no two clients' legal needs are exactly the same, and I tailor myplan of action to the specific needs of my client.

Practice Areas
DUI & DWI
Criminal Law
Criminal Appeals, Drug Crimes, Expungement, Fraud, Gun Crimes, Internet Crimes, Sex Crimes, Theft, Violent Crimes
Traffic Tickets
Suspended License
Fees
  • Free Consultation
  • Credit Cards Accepted
    All Major Cards
  • Contingent Fees
    No fee without successful recovery for personal injury and workers' compensation cases.
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
North Carolina
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
Languages
  • English: Spoken, Written
  • Spanish: Spoken
Professional Experience
Litigation Attorney/Partner
SeiferFlatow, PLLC
- Current
Associate Attorney
Richard A. Peniston & Associates
-
Associate Attorney
Wishart Norris Henninger & Pittman
-
Associate Attorney
McGuireWoods
-
Education
University of Illinois College of Law
J.D. (1999) | Law
-
Honors: Magna Cum Laude
University of Illinois College of Law Logo
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
MBA
-
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign Logo
Tufts University
B.A. | Economics
-
Honors: Magna Cum Laude
Tufts University Logo
Oxford University, OXFORD ENGLAND
other (1995) | Economics
-
Placeholder image for education.
Awards
Legal Elite
Business North Carolina
Adam was recently voted by his peers and colleagues to North Carolina Business Journal’s list of Legal Elite for 2017 in the category of criminal defense and DWI/DUI. This honor recognizes the fact that his courtroom achievements and skills are acknowledged by both the general public as well as by fellow members of the legal community.
Top 100 Trial Lawyers
National Trial Lawyers Association
Adam has also been named to the National Trial Lawyers’ list of the Top 40 litigators in the State of North Carolina under the age of 40 as well as the list of the Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America. Each year, no more than 40 of the lawyers in the state under the age of 40 receive this honor and no more than 100 lawyers in the country receive the distinction of top 100 litigators. Membership into the Top 40 under 40 and Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America association is by invitation only and is extended exclusively to those individuals who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results, and leadership as a young trial lawyer. It is also in a large part based on peer review and nomination.
Nation's Top DUI Attorneys
National Advocacy for DUI Defense
This organization recognizes the top DUI lawyers in the country and has recognized Adam M. Seifer for his effective work in this field. Those recognized by this organization must meet several qualifications including demonstrated success in this criminal defense field and meeting standards for focus on this field and tried cases.
Super Lawyer
Super Lawyers
Adam was named to the North Carolina Super Lawyers list as one of the top criminal defense and DUI/DWI attorneys in North Carolina for 2015. Each year, no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state receive this honor. The selection for this respected list is made by the research team at Super Lawyers and is one of the highest honors that can be bestowed upon North Carolina's lawyers
Finalist for Readers' Cloice, Best Law Firm in Charlotte in 2014
Charlotte Observer
SeiferFlatow was voted one of three finalists for Best Law Firm in Charlotte in 2014 as voted by the readers of Charlotte's main newspaper, the Charlotte Observer.
Life Member
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
The Million Dollar Advocates Forum is recognized as one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States. Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million dollar verdicts, awards and settlements. The organization was founded in 1993 and there are approximately 4000 members located throughout the country. Fewer than 1% of U.S. lawyers are members. Forum membership acknowledges excellence in advocacy, and provides members with a national network of experienced colleagues for professional referral and information exchange in major cases. Members must have acted as principal counsel in at least one case in which their client has received a verdict, award or settlement in the amount of one million dollars or more. Please see our website for further details concerning membership qualifications.
Top 40 Under 40
National Trial Lawyers Association
Adam has also been named to the National Trial Lawyers’ list of the Top 40 litigators in the State of North Carolina under the age of 40 as well as the list of the Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America. Each year, no more than 40 of the lawyers in the state under the age of 40 receive this honor and no more than 100 lawyers in the country receive the distinction of top 100 litigators. Membership into the Top 40 under 40 and Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America association is by invitation only and is extended exclusively to those individuals who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results, and leadership as a young trial lawyer. It is also in a large part based on peer review and nomination.
Rising Star
Super Lawyers
Adam was named to the North Carolina Rising Stars list as one of the top up-and-coming attorneys in North Carolina for 2012. Each year, no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state receive this honor. The selection for this respected list is made by the research team at Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a rigorous multi-phased process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates, and peer reviews by practice area.
Professional Associations
North Carolina State Bar
Member
- Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Mecklenburg County Bar Association
Executive Committee Member
-
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Websites & Blogs
Website
Website
Website
Adam M. Seifer's Independent 3rd Party Internet Reviews
Blog
SeiferFlatow Legal Blog
Videos
The State has two ways it can prove that you committed the offense of Driving while impaired, or DWI. The first way is by showing that your physical and mental abilities were significantly impaired.  The other way is by proving that you had an alcohol concentration that was over the legal limit. The way the state usually tries to prove the first method is through the officer How does the State prove I committed a DWI?

The State has two ways it can prove that you committed the offense of Driving while impaired, or DWI. The first way is by showing that your physical and mental abilities were significantly impaired. The other way is by proving that you had an alcohol concentration that was over the legal limit. The way the state usually tries to prove the first method is through the officer

This video answers the question: "I know I was drunk and am guilty.  Why do I need an attorney?" You may have several legal defenses of which you were unaware, besides whether or not you were actually driving while impaired. For example, did the officer have reasonable suspicion to pull you over or did he have probable cause to arrest you. Just because you believe or even know that, in hindsight, you were impaired doesn I know I was drunk and am guilty. Why do I need an attorney?

This video answers the question: "I know I was drunk and am guilty. Why do I need an attorney?" You may have several legal defenses of which you were unaware, besides whether or not you were actually driving while impaired. For example, did the officer have reasonable suspicion to pull you over or did he have probable cause to arrest you. Just because you believe or even know that, in hindsight, you were impaired doesn

When the officer requests that you provide a sample, you have the right to refuse to provide a breath sample. However, if you refuse, your license will be suspended for a period of 1 year solely on account of the refusal and regardless of the outcome of your actual case.  The reason that DMV can suspend your license for refusing to blow is because our courts have said that driving is a privilege not a right. By driving on public streets, you have in essence given your consent to be chemically tested upon suspicion of DWI.  You have the right to refuse, but DMV is allowed to penalize you by suspending your driving privileges. If you refuse, the officer may then transport you to the hospital and obtain a search warrant to draw your blood to get a blood alcohol concentration reading. If the officer does not draw blood, then the State will be limited in its ability to directly prove that you were impaired while driving. If the officer marks you as a refusal, you will be notified by DMV that your driving privileges are going to be suspended for a year for refusing a chemical test.  However, you can request a hearing to challenge the grounds of the willful refusal and as long as you request the hearing before the suspension begins, the suspension will not commence until you have had your hearing with DMV.  If you have any DWI/DUI related questions, please give me and my law firm SeiferFlatow a call at 704-512-0606. What happens if I refuse to provide breath sample at police station after arrest?

When the officer requests that you provide a sample, you have the right to refuse to provide a breath sample. However, if you refuse, your license will be suspended for a period of 1 year solely on account of the refusal and regardless of the outcome of your actual case. The reason that DMV can suspend your license for refusing to blow is because our courts have said that driving is a privilege not a right. By driving on public streets, you have in essence given your consent to be chemically tested upon suspicion of DWI. You have the right to refuse, but DMV is allowed to penalize you by suspending your driving privileges. If you refuse, the officer may then transport you to the hospital and obtain a search warrant to draw your blood to get a blood alcohol concentration reading. If the officer does not draw blood, then the State will be limited in its ability to directly prove that you were impaired while driving. If the officer marks you as a refusal, you will be notified by DMV that your driving privileges are going to be suspended for a year for refusing a chemical test. However, you can request a hearing to challenge the grounds of the willful refusal and as long as you request the hearing before the suspension begins, the suspension will not commence until you have had your hearing with DMV. If you have any DWI/DUI related questions, please give me and my law firm SeiferFlatow a call at 704-512-0606.

This video explains what the ignition interlock device is a it pertains to a Driving While Impaired (DWI) charge in North Carolina and when you are required to install it in your vehicle after a conviction.  When you What is the ignition interlock device and will I be required to install it?

This video explains what the ignition interlock device is a it pertains to a Driving While Impaired (DWI) charge in North Carolina and when you are required to install it in your vehicle after a conviction. When you

Most North Carolina counties including here in Mecklenburg County, will not reduce a DWI at all to a lesser charge.  The only time there is ever any negotiating when it comes to a DWI is when you receive other charges in addition to the DWI. Because the state wants the conviction for the Driving While Impaired charge, it will gladly dismiss the remaining charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the DWI. Other than that, you are either pleading not guilty and going to trial to try to prove your innocence or you are pleading guilty to Driving While Impaired.  A DWI in North Carolina is pretty much an all or nothing charge. There is no compromise, no in between.  If you have any DWI/DUI related questions, please give me and my law firm SeiferFlatow a call at 704-512-0606. I've heard some states reduce DWIs to a lesser charge like reckless driving. Is this possible in NC?

Most North Carolina counties including here in Mecklenburg County, will not reduce a DWI at all to a lesser charge. The only time there is ever any negotiating when it comes to a DWI is when you receive other charges in addition to the DWI. Because the state wants the conviction for the Driving While Impaired charge, it will gladly dismiss the remaining charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the DWI. Other than that, you are either pleading not guilty and going to trial to try to prove your innocence or you are pleading guilty to Driving While Impaired. A DWI in North Carolina is pretty much an all or nothing charge. There is no compromise, no in between. If you have any DWI/DUI related questions, please give me and my law firm SeiferFlatow a call at 704-512-0606.

What is the penalty for a first time DWI offender and is jail mandatory? In North Carolina, there are 6 levels for sentencing upon conviction. There What is the penalty for a first time offender and is jail mandatory?

What is the penalty for a first time DWI offender and is jail mandatory? In North Carolina, there are 6 levels for sentencing upon conviction. There

In North Carolina, an officer cant just pull you over for no reason. He has to have reasonable suspicion, which is defined as specific facts that indicate that criminal activity is afoot.  For example, if you were involved in a motor vehicle accident or you committed a minor traffic infraction such as speeding or failing to stop at a stop sign, the officer then has the right to pull you over and conduct a further brief investigation.  This is how a lot of DWI cases begin. You commit a minor traffic violation and the officer pulls you over.  He detects the odor of alcohol so he asks you some questions and your answers lead him to believe that you are impaired. He then has the legal authority to perform a DWI investigation.  Certain behavior may or may not give rise to reasonable suspicion. For instance, our Courts have held that weaving within your own lane without crossing into another lane does not in and of itself give rise to reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle and investigate. A successful legal challenge to the stop on reasonable suspicion grounds means that he didn What is reasonable suspicion to investigate?

In North Carolina, an officer cant just pull you over for no reason. He has to have reasonable suspicion, which is defined as specific facts that indicate that criminal activity is afoot. For example, if you were involved in a motor vehicle accident or you committed a minor traffic infraction such as speeding or failing to stop at a stop sign, the officer then has the right to pull you over and conduct a further brief investigation. This is how a lot of DWI cases begin. You commit a minor traffic violation and the officer pulls you over. He detects the odor of alcohol so he asks you some questions and your answers lead him to believe that you are impaired. He then has the legal authority to perform a DWI investigation. Certain behavior may or may not give rise to reasonable suspicion. For instance, our Courts have held that weaving within your own lane without crossing into another lane does not in and of itself give rise to reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle and investigate. A successful legal challenge to the stop on reasonable suspicion grounds means that he didn

Before the officer can obtain a breath sample at the police station, the officer has to read you certain rights, called your implied consent rights. These include the right to refuse to provide a sample and the consequences in doing so, the right to obtain your own chemical test after you are released, and the right to call a witness or attorney to witness the test so long as the testing is not delayed by more than 30 mins.  Upon release from custody, you have the right to get your own chemical test. This usually entails going to the hospital and having them draw blood so it can be analyzed for blood alcohol concentration.  You also have the right to call someone to witness the test. If you exercise this right, then the officer has to wait 30 minutes for that person to arrive before he can attempt to collect a breath sample.  If he does not wait the full 30 minutes, it may be grounds to keep the breath test result out of evidence.  Even if nobody is able to come to the station, calling a witness or an attorney at least buys you additional time for some more alcohol to exit your system. This could mean the difference between guilt or innocence in borderline cases. If you have any DWI/DUI related questions, please give me and my law firm SeiferFlatow a call at 704-512-0606. What are my rights when asked to provide a breath sample at the police station after I'm arrested?

Before the officer can obtain a breath sample at the police station, the officer has to read you certain rights, called your implied consent rights. These include the right to refuse to provide a sample and the consequences in doing so, the right to obtain your own chemical test after you are released, and the right to call a witness or attorney to witness the test so long as the testing is not delayed by more than 30 mins. Upon release from custody, you have the right to get your own chemical test. This usually entails going to the hospital and having them draw blood so it can be analyzed for blood alcohol concentration. You also have the right to call someone to witness the test. If you exercise this right, then the officer has to wait 30 minutes for that person to arrive before he can attempt to collect a breath sample. If he does not wait the full 30 minutes, it may be grounds to keep the breath test result out of evidence. Even if nobody is able to come to the station, calling a witness or an attorney at least buys you additional time for some more alcohol to exit your system. This could mean the difference between guilt or innocence in borderline cases. If you have any DWI/DUI related questions, please give me and my law firm SeiferFlatow a call at 704-512-0606.

When an officer suspects that you have been driving while impaired, he has to develop his case before he can arrest you. He must have probable cause to arrest. This means that there have to be specific facts that, when taken as a whole, indicate that you most likely have committed the offense. This standard is not as high as beyond a reasonable doubt which is the standard used to actually convict someone, but the officer still has to show that the arrest itself was based on specific facts that support his theory of driving while impaired.  The officer What is Probable Cause?

When an officer suspects that you have been driving while impaired, he has to develop his case before he can arrest you. He must have probable cause to arrest. This means that there have to be specific facts that, when taken as a whole, indicate that you most likely have committed the offense. This standard is not as high as beyond a reasonable doubt which is the standard used to actually convict someone, but the officer still has to show that the arrest itself was based on specific facts that support his theory of driving while impaired. The officer

When an officer suspects that you have been driving while impaired, he has to develop his case before he can actually arrest you. He must have probable cause to arrest. This means that there have to be specific facts that, when taken as a whole, indicate that you most likely committed the offense. This standard is not as high as beyond a reasonable doubt which is the standard used to actually convict someone, but the officer still has to show that the arrest itself was based on specific facts that support his theory of driving while impaired.  When he has you perform the roadside tests, which are certainly designed for you to fail, he is essentially using the results of those tests to justify the arrest.  Keep in mind, the officer normally makes up his mind to arrest within the first few minutes of making contact with you.  All he is doing by investigating further is giving himself a way to justify your arrest in a court of law.  So, in a nutshell, even if you do cooperate with the officer, he will still arrest you for, quote unquote, poor performance on his tests. On the other hand, if you politely refuse to perform the tests, the officer will not want to cut you any breaks and will arrest you for being intoxicated and uncooperative. However, it will be much easier for your lawyer to challenge the legal basis for the arrest if the officer isn Should I perform officer's field sobriety tests on side of the road?

When an officer suspects that you have been driving while impaired, he has to develop his case before he can actually arrest you. He must have probable cause to arrest. This means that there have to be specific facts that, when taken as a whole, indicate that you most likely committed the offense. This standard is not as high as beyond a reasonable doubt which is the standard used to actually convict someone, but the officer still has to show that the arrest itself was based on specific facts that support his theory of driving while impaired. When he has you perform the roadside tests, which are certainly designed for you to fail, he is essentially using the results of those tests to justify the arrest. Keep in mind, the officer normally makes up his mind to arrest within the first few minutes of making contact with you. All he is doing by investigating further is giving himself a way to justify your arrest in a court of law. So, in a nutshell, even if you do cooperate with the officer, he will still arrest you for, quote unquote, poor performance on his tests. On the other hand, if you politely refuse to perform the tests, the officer will not want to cut you any breaks and will arrest you for being intoxicated and uncooperative. However, it will be much easier for your lawyer to challenge the legal basis for the arrest if the officer isn

Legal Answers
1 Questions Answered
Q. What kind of drivers license test will you have to take when you get your license reinstated from a DUI
A: You will just have to pay a reinstatement fee not take a test.
View More Answers
Contact & Map
SeiferFlatow, PLLC
2319 Crescent Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28207
US
Telephone: (704) 512-0606
Monday: 9 AM - 5 PM (Today)
Tuesday: 9 AM - 5 PM
Wednesday: 9 AM - 5 PM
Thursday: 9 AM - 5 PM
Friday: 9 AM - 5 PM
Saturday: Closed
Sunday: Closed