Offers Video ConferencingTap to Call This Lawyer
I am a seasoned and accomplished litigator with a distinguished track record of success in navigating complex civil litigation. I earned my Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from UC Berkeley School of Law, one of the nation’s most prestigious legal institutions, and am admitted to the State Bar of California and Washington D.C. My career spans a wide range of legal practice areas, including business litigation, trademark and copyright disputes, inverse condemnation, defamation, premises liability, and personal injury cases.
My deep understanding of the legal system, coupled with my sharp analytical skills and strategic thinking, has enabled me to achieve outstanding results for my clients. I have successfully represented individuals and businesses in State and Federal Courts, as well as in arbitrations and mediations, consistently delivering favorable outcomes in high-stakes disputes.
Known for my meticulous preparation, persuasive advocacy, and unwavering commitment to my clients, I provide exceptional legal representation tailored to meet the unique needs of each case. Whether tackling intricate legal challenges or fighting for justice, my professionalism and dedication make me a trusted ally for those seeking outstanding legal services.
- Business Law
- Business Litigation
- Google Meet
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- Free Consultation
- Credit Cards Accepted
- California
- State Bar of California
- ID Number: 321018
-
- District of Columbia
- District of Columbia Bar
- ID Number: 90017982
-
- English: Spoken, Written
- Russian: Spoken, Written
- Litigation Counsel
- Kolmogorov Law
- - Current
- Senior Litigation Counsel
- Brower Law Group, APC
- -
- Litigation Associate
- Barrington Legal, Inc.
- -
- Attorney
- Hausfeld, LLP
- -
- University of California, Berkeley School of Law
-
- Client's Choice
- Avvo
- Client's Choice
- Avvo
- Silver Client Champion
- Martindale-Hubbell
- California State Bar  # 321018
- - Current
-
- Business Lawyer for Corporations in California
- Pavel Kolmogorov
- Motion to Compel Guide
- Pavel Kolmogorov
- Civil Litigation Deadlines Quick Guide (California)
- Pavel Kolmogorov
- Understanding Pleading and Motions in California Civil Litigation
- Pavel Kolmogorov
- Navigating Complex Civil Disputes: Strategies to Success
- The Price of Business, Radio Show
- https://usabusinessradio.com/navigating-complex-civil-disputes-strategies-to-success/
- Corporate Finance Fundamentals
- Berkeley Law Executive Education
- Q. Is it legal for a board member to use employees for another company?
- A: Generally speaking, the situation you've described is not allowed. Here are the main issues I see:
1. Director’s Breach of Duty: Directors must act in the best interests of their company and its shareholders. Using the company's employees for another business without proper approval, documentation, or payment could be seen as self-dealing—essentially, the director benefiting personally at the company's expense. This is a violation of the director’s duty of loyalty.
2. Wage and Employment Issues: Your company is currently paying employees for work they're doing for someone else. This could create wage and hour problems, such as unpaid overtime or missed breaks. ... Read More
- Q. Is the Manager's conduct lawful in altering contact without notice in a CA LLC?
- A: The manager's conduct in changing the contact method without notice or consent may not be lawful under California LLC laws and the operating agreement, depending on the specific terms of the operating agreement and the manager's fiduciary duties. California law provides that the operating agreement governs the relationship between members and managers, as well as the conduct of the LLC's activities. If the operating agreement specifies a particular contact for the manager and does not allow unilateral changes without member consent, the manager's actions could violate the agreement (Cal. Corp. Code, § 17701.10)
Additionally, managers in a manager-managed LLC owe fiduciary ... Read More
- Q. Legal justification for consistent attorney fees in debt collections
- A: When a contract includes an attorneys’ fees clause, it typically allows the prevailing party to recover “reasonable” attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing the agreement. Even if the legal work is repetitive or done using templates, the key issue is whether the fees claimed are reasonable under the circumstances—not necessarily whether the attorney was salaried, or the work was "easy."
Even if a company uses in-house attorneys who are salaried, courts may still allow recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees based on the fair market value of the legal services provided—not just the actual cost to the company. The rationale is that the attorney's time has value, and ... Read More