Pavel Kolmogorov Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›

I am a seasoned and accomplished litigator with a distinguished track record of success in navigating complex civil litigation. I earned my Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from UC Berkeley School of Law, one of the nation’s most prestigious legal institutions, and am admitted to the State Bar of California and Washington D.C. My career spans a wide range of legal practice areas, including business litigation, trademark and copyright disputes, inverse condemnation, defamation, premises liability, and personal injury cases.

My deep understanding of the legal system, coupled with my sharp analytical skills and strategic thinking, has enabled me to achieve outstanding results for my clients. I have successfully represented individuals and businesses in State and Federal Courts, as well as in arbitrations and mediations, consistently delivering favorable outcomes in high-stakes disputes.

Known for my meticulous preparation, persuasive advocacy, and unwavering commitment to my clients, I provide exceptional legal representation tailored to meet the unique needs of each case. Whether tackling intricate legal challenges or fighting for justice, my professionalism and dedication make me a trusted ally for those seeking outstanding legal services.

• Google Meet
• Zoom
• Microsoft Teams

• Free Consultation
• Credit Cards Accepted

California

State Bar of California

ID Number: 321018

Since 2018

District of Columbia

District of Columbia Bar

ID Number: 90017982

Since 2023

Litigation Counsel

Kolmogorov Law

2024 - Current

Senior Litigation Counsel

Brower Law Group, APC

2021 - 2024

Litigation Associate

Barrington Legal, Inc.

2019 - 2021

Attorney

Hausfeld, LLP

2017 - 2018

University of California, Berkeley School of Law

Client's Choice

Avvo

2025

Client's Choice

Avvo

2024

Silver Client Champion

Martindale-Hubbell

2024

California State Bar  # 321018

2018 - Current

Breach of Real Estate Contract in California: What You Need to Know to Protect Your Investment

Pavel Kolmogorov

May 12, 2025

Secrets to Winning Your California Lawsuit: Mastering Discovery Strategies

Pavel Kolmogorov

May 2, 2025

Arbitration vs. Litigation in California: The Pros, the Cons, and What You May Be Giving Up

Pavel Kolmogorov

April 14, 2025

Wrongfully Fired in California? Here's What You Need to Know—and Do Next.

Pavel Kolmogorov

March 26, 2025

Copyright Registration: The Best Way to Protect Your Intellectual Property in California.

Pavel Kolmogorov

March 14, 2025

Navigating Complex Civil Disputes: Strategies to Success

February 3, 2025

The Price of Business, Radio Show

https://usabusinessradio.com/navigating-complex-civil-disputes-strategies-to-success/

Corporate Finance Fundamentals

Berkeley Law Executive Education

2024

Q. Is the Manager's conduct lawful in altering contact without notice in a CA LLC?

May 16, 2025

A: The manager's conduct in changing the contact method without notice or consent may not be lawful under California LLC laws and the operating agreement, depending on the specific terms of the operating agreement and the manager's fiduciary duties. California law provides that the operating agreement governs the relationship between members and managers, as well as the conduct of the LLC's activities. If the operating agreement specifies a particular contact for the manager and does not allow unilateral changes without member consent, the manager's actions could violate the agreement (Cal. Corp. Code, § 17701.10)

Additionally, managers in a manager-managed LLC owe fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the LLC and its members, and they must act in good faith and deal fairly with the members. (Cal. Corp. Code, § 17704.09) Changing the contact method in a way that restricts access to financial information or communication with the manager could potentially breach these duties.

Under California law, members of an LLC have the right to request and receive certain financial information, including annual cash flow statements, for purposes reasonably related to their interests as members. For LLCs with more than 35 members, the manager is required to provide an annual report containing financial statements, including a statement of cash flows, within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year. Members representing at least 5% of the voting interests or three or more members may also request interim financial statements, which must be provided within 30 days of the request. (Cal. Corp. Code, § 17704.10) If the manager or investor relations team fails to provide this information, they may be in violation of these statutory requirements.

To regain direct communication with the manager, you should first review the operating agreement to determine whether the manager's actions violate its terms. If the operating agreement has been breached, you may consider taking legal action to enforce its provisions. Additionally, you can make a formal written request for the financial information you are entitled to under California law. If the manager fails to comply, you may seek a court order compelling the manager to provide the requested information. Furthermore, if the manager's conduct constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty, you may have grounds to pursue a claim for damages or other remedies. (Cal. Corp. Code, §§ 17701.10, 17704.09, 17704.10) ... Read More

Q. Legal justification for consistent attorney fees in debt collections

April 16, 2025

A: When a contract includes an attorneys’ fees clause, it typically allows the prevailing party to recover “reasonable” attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing the agreement. Even if the legal work is repetitive or done using templates, the key issue is whether the fees claimed are reasonable under the circumstances—not necessarily whether the attorney was salaried, or the work was "easy."

Even if a company uses in-house attorneys who are salaried, courts may still allow recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees based on the fair market value of the legal services provided—not just the actual cost to the company. The rationale is that the attorney's time has value, and it would be unfair to penalize a party just because they used internal counsel.

The use of templates or routine filings doesn’t automatically invalidate a fee claim. However, if the same "boilerplate" work is being charged at a high flat rate without any reflection of actual time spent or complexity, you may be able to challenge the fee amount as unreasonable or excessive. ... Read More

Q. How to enforce a terminated contract's ownership terms for Roblox development in California?

April 10, 2025

A: First, review the contract itself. You mentioned it clearly states that any work put into Bloxstar Corporation is owned by the company. Check for specific clauses like an “assignment of rights” or “work-for-hire” provision. These typically mean that any contributions (like UI designs) made by the collaborator automatically belong to the company, regardless of who created them. If the language is airtight—e.g., “all work product, including but not limited to UI designs, developed during the term of this agreement is the sole property of Bloxstar Corporation”—then you’ve got a strong foundation.

Next, confirm the termination terms. Since the contract is terminated, look at what it says about post-termination rights. Does it specify that ownership of prior work remains with Bloxstar? If it’s silent on this, the original ownership clause likely still applies unless the collaborator can prove otherwise. Their departure doesn’t automatically undo the agreement they signed.

Gather evidence of the work’s context. Can you show the UI was created as part of their role with Bloxstar? Screenshots, version histories, or even Roblox project files tied to your company’s account could demonstrate this. If the collaborator used your resources, followed your direction, or integrated the UI into a Bloxstar project, it reinforces that the work was done for the company, not as their personal project.

Then, consider sending a formal cease-and-desist letter reiterating the contractual IP assignment and their lack of rights to the work.

If they push back, consider your enforcement options. For Roblox-specific disputes, the platform’s terms of service might come into play—check if they address IP ownership or project collaborations. Roblox generally respects real-world contracts, so your agreement should hold weight. If the collaborator is using the UI in a new project, you could file a DMCA takedown notice with Roblox, attaching the contract as evidence. ... Read More