Nicholas Brock Enger

Nicholas Brock Enger

Brock Enger Law
  • Employment Law, Medical Malpractice, Landlord Tenant ...
  • California, Wisconsin
Review This Lawyer
Badges
Claimed Lawyer ProfileOffers Video ConferencingQ&A
Biography

Plaintiffs' attorney deeply committed to protecting and enforcing individual rights. Please feel welcome to reach out for a free consultation.

Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice

California, 2025
Wisconsin, 2021
U.S. Supreme Court, 2025
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, 2022

Practice Areas

Employment Law
Medical Malpractice
Landlord Tenant
Civil Rights
Wrongful Death
Personal Injury
Consumer Law
Litigation

Contact

Email: brock.enger@fo4.us

Practice Areas
Employment Law
Employment Contracts, Employment Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Whistleblower, Wrongful Termination
Medical Malpractice
Birth Injury, Medical Misdiagnosis, Pharmacy Errors, Surgical Errors
Landlord Tenant
Evictions, Housing Discrimination, Rent Control, Tenants' Rights
Civil Rights
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Discrimination, Employment
Personal Injury
Animal & Dog Bites, Brain Injury, Car Accidents, Construction Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, Premises Liability, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death
Real Estate Law
Condominiums, Homeowners Association
Consumer Law
Class Action
Additional Practice Area
  • Litigation
Video Conferencing
  • FaceTime
  • Google Meet
  • Skype
  • Zoom
  • GoToMeeting
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Signal
Fees
  • Free Consultation
  • Contingent Fees
    Contingency fees are appropriate for some cases.
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
California
State Bar of California
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Court System
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
U.S. Supreme Court
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
Languages
  • English: Spoken, Written
Professional Experience
Attorney
Brock Enger Law
- Current
Member
N. Brock Enger Legal Research, LLC
-
Research & Writing Associate
SW&L Attorneys
-
Research Assistantship
University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School
-
Education
University of Wisconsin Law School
Honors: Cum laude; Dean’s Academic Achievement Award; Best Performance in Course: Civil Procedure II; Samson Fellow
University of Wisconsin Law School Logo
Awards
146 MPRE
National Conference of Bar Examiners
The MPRE (Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination) tests the application of ethical laws governing lawyers and is required for admission to the bars of all but two U.S. jurisdictions. A score of 146 on the August 2025 MPRE exam ranks in the 99.7th percentile, placing the test-taker among a top cohort of approximately 75 individuals out of 20,109 examinees nationwide.
Citizen Recognition Life Saving Award
Governmental Entity
Professional Associations
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles
- Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Danish American Center
-
Placeholder image for professional associations.
American Association for Justice (AAJ)
-
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Speaking Engagements
Executive Power and its Intersection with Racial Justice, Columbia Law School
Columbia Journal of Race and Law
Legal Answers
15 Questions Answered
Q. Should I disclose my CPTSD diagnosis to HR to seek support?
A: As a practical matter, it’s generally not a good idea to disclose a medical or mental-health condition to an employer unless you are specifically seeking a reasonable accommodation—and even then, the less medical detail you provide, generally, the better. A CPTSD diagnosis unfortunately carries stigma. I’ve seen too many situations where the discrimination and retaliation begin after a disclosure, and it’s very difficult to prove in employment cases. The McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework is unforgiving, and people often assume they have more legal protection than they actually do.

Also remember: HR works for the company, not for you. In many ways, you can think of them like civil defense attorneys. They are not there to protect you, and they will turn on you quickly if they think it benefits the employer. Their priority is the company’s bottom line, not your well-being.

If you truly need an accommodation, you can request one, but be guarded about detailing your diagnosis. Otherwise, think very carefully before disclosing any medical information to an employer.

This information is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute specific legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
... Read More
Q. Can I negotiate severance with threat of lawsuit after disability disclosure?
A: It is certainly possible that you are being treated disparately because you disclosed a disability, especially if the negative feedback only began after that disclosure. If you have prior performance reviews reflecting satisfactory work, and the shift to “low performance” allegations occurred only after your manager learned that you had the medical condition, that timing—temporal proximity—can support an inference that the disclosure was the reason for the adverse action.

Under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the elements of a prima facie case of disability discrimination are set out in Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc. (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 297, 310, which provides as follows: “The plaintiff can meet this burden by presenting evidence that demonstrates, even circumstantially or by inference, that he or she (1) suffered from a disability, or was regarded as suffering from a disability; (2) could perform the essential duties of the job with or without reasonable accommodations, and (3) was subjected to an adverse employment action because of the disability or perceived disability.”

Employers sometimes negotiate stronger severance awards when faced with facts that support a viable FEHA discrimination claim. Given the circumstances you’ve described, it may be worth attempting to negotiate a larger severance—or, if the offer is inadequate, consider filing a lawsuit.

This information is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute specific legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
... Read More
Q. Can a program legally open my mail without permission?
A: No, the program cannot open your mail without your explicit consent, as a matter of both federal and state law.

18 U.S.C. § 1702 provides that "Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of . . . any authorized depository for mail matter . . . before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed . . . with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens . . . the same . . . shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both." Additionally, the California Constitution, Article 1, Section 1, confers on every citizen a fundamental right to privacy, providing that: “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are . . . pursuing and obtaining . . . privacy.”

To address this issue, you can make it clear that you do not consent to this conduct and that it violates federal and state law. You also have the option of filing a complaint with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, which enforces federal mail-tampering laws, and with the county agency administering the program.

It should also be noted that there are several potential causes of action available, including intrusion upon seclusion, conversion, and violation of California constitutional privacy rights.

This information is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute specific legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
... Read More
View More Answers
Contact & Map
280 S. Avenida Caballeros, Unit 260
Palm Springs, CA 92262
US