Robert Gingras

Did not provide adequate legal representation I hired Attorney Robert Gingras in 1995 for sexual harassment case. Attorney Gingras had agreed to represent me and came highly recommended. This case dragged on unusually long, until 1999, when he said that the 7th circuit, Judge Barbara Crabb, ruled on a case which basically invalidated quid pro quo cases, meaning to me it was ok for an employee to hinge a person's employment on sexual activity. Attorney Gingras says in his ads he "fights for the little guys." I don't believe this is true and do not feel I was adequately represented by Attorney Gingras. I was constantly chasing him for answers and was not kept in the loop. I had to leave my job because the harassment wouldn't stop. I wish very much that I had hired an attorney that cared, because I was young, naive and had my whole career ahead of me. Further, I deserved much better representation. View More