
Lea T Bickerton
Lea T Bickerton's Response: I respectfully note that this review is false. I encourage this person to review the relevant communication records (including text messages and email messages), case filings, witness court records, and hearing transcripts that contradict the assertions he is making. I respectfully note that I would rather let an inaccurate review stand than violate my continuing duty to past clients by posting privileged and confidential information to prove myself. I will, however, proudly state that it is my practice to submit a thorough brief that includes in-depth analysis of the relevant case law and show how that applies to the facts of the case rather than rely upon a spontaneous oral argument on the day of the hearing when the case calls for it. I want to be sure that I have given the judge every possible chance and every possible reason to rule in my client's favor and reduce the likelihood of having a favorable ruling overturned on appeal. This is a service that is generally included in the flat fee. I also don’t dispute that I will file interlocutory appeals with a request for expedited review while cases are still pending if I receive an unfavorable ruling early in the case when the facts call for it. In a situation where discovery has not been provided, the best option is generally to seek review of the adjudicator’s refusal to compel discovery before any hearing or final order in the case is issued. I will also note that I generally do not charge an extra fee for this type of work or for the filing fee that is required because it is usually included in the original agreement and I am proud to do the work necessary to get a favorable result for my client. Ultimately, I am disappointed in any case where my client is unhappy with the outcome. However, I stand by the standard of representation I offered in this case.