Free Consultation: (310) 410-9902Tap to Call This Lawyer
Tobie B. Waxman
Offering cost effective, compassionate representation for 30 years.
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5.0
Legal Analysis
5.0/5.0
Communication Skills
5.0/5.0
Ethics and Professionalism
5.0/5.0
Badges
Claimed Lawyer ProfileQ&A
Biography
Providing high quality legal representation to a wide range of clients throughout the greater Los Angeles area since 1993. I offer reasonable and highly competitive hourly rates where applicable. Prenuptial Agreements and Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDRO) are expertly prepared for one flat fee. The best interests of the children are the focus of the courts and of my law practice. Once your family law matter has resolved, you will not be abandoned. If modifications of any support, child custody or visitation orders are needed in the future, contact my office to reopen your file.
Practice Areas
- Family Law
- Child Custody, Child Support, Father's Rights, Paternity, Prenups & Marital Agreements, Restraining Orders, Same Sex Family Law
- Divorce
- Contested Divorce, Property Division, Same Sex Divorce, Spousal Support & Alimony, Uncontested Divorce
Additional Practice Areas
- Prenuptial Agreements
- Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDRO)
Fees
-
Free Consultation
Hourly rate is $350. Acceptable forms of payment include credit cards, Zelle, cash and checks (personal, certified and/or money orders). - Credit Cards Accepted
-
Rates, Retainers and Additional Information
QDROs and Prenuptial Agreements are handled on a flat fee basis.
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
- California
Languages
- English
Professional Experience
- Sole Proprietor
- Law Offices of Tobie B. Waxman
- - Current
- Pro Bono Panel Attorney
- Harriett Buhai Center for Family Law
- -
- Associate
- Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, et. al.
- -
- Associate
- Patterson, Ritner, Lockwood, Gartner & Jurich
- -
- Sole Prioprietor
- Law Offices of Tobie B. Waxman
- -
Education
- George Washington Univ
- Undergraduate Degree
- Loyola Law School
- Law Degree
Awards
- Client Champion/Silver
- Martindale-Hubbell
- Client Champions are an elite group of attorneys who have received exceptional reviews from the people that know them best; their clients. The confidential client review process is managed and monitored by the world's most trusted legal resource, Martindale-Hubbell.
- Top Attorney
- AVVO
- AVVO rating of 10.0 (Superb)
- Client Champion/Silver
- Martindale-Hubbell
- Client Champions are an elite group of attorneys who have received exceptional reviews from the people that know them best; their clients. The confidential client review process is managed and monitored by the world's most trusted legal resource, Martindale-Hubbell.
- Client Champion/Silver
- Martindale-Hubbell
- Client Champions are an elite group of attorneys who have received exceptional reviews from the people that know them best; their clients. The confidential client review process is managed and monitored by the world's most trusted legal resource, Martindale-Hubbell.
- Client Champion/Silver
- Martindale-Hubbell
- Client Champions are an elite group of attorneys who have received exceptional reviews from the people that know them best; their clients. The confidential client review process is managed and monitored by the world's most trusted legal resource, Martindale-Hubbell.
Professional Associations
- Los Angeles County Bar Association
- Member
- - Current
- California State Bar  # 167151
- Member
- - Current
- Culver Marina Bar Association
- Member
- -
Publications
Legal Answers
807 Questions Answered
- Q. Ex Filed Request for Trial Setting: How Do I File a Motion to Strike?
- A: First, if the other party has not filed their FL141, the request for trial setting will be rejected. Second, you do not need to file a motion to strike that request. Instead, filing an objection to the request for trial setting is sufficient assuming you list all the valid bases for objecting to the request. Third, separately, you can file a motion to compel the other party to provide their financial disclosures, provided you have already provided yours. [See Family Code §2107]
- Q. Discovery Responses: Motion to Compel vs. Motion to Exclude Evidence
- A: Expanding on Mr Light’s response, it sounds like counsel made no effort to try to open that link up to 50 days after you provided it. Why? Why not let you know sooner that the link allegedly didn’t work? You cannot move to exclude evidence until after the party has violated a court order compelling a response or compelling production. Find another way to get the documents to him (including sending hard copies). If he does in fact file a motion to exclude evidence (rather than a motion to compel) you will need to show the court what efforts were made to comply and what time line counsel followed. For heavens sake, hire an attorney! If your spouse has a lawyer you should have one too.
- Q. Partial Discovery Responses: Motion Options After 50 Days
- A: To compel further responses to discovery, the moving party must file the motion within 45 days (plus 5 additional calendar days if the responses were served by USPS) to file their motion. There is a meet and confer requirement that must be satisfied before the motion is filed. If your ex waited 50 days after you served the responses before taking issue with your responses, his/her motion will be untimely and should be denied on that basis alone. Your opposition to the motion must raise that as a defense (i.e. bring it to the court's attention).
Social Media
Contact & Map