Meg Strickler Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›

Meg Strickler, a criminal defense attorney with Conaway & Strickler, PC, in Atlanta, Georgia, has earned an international reputation for her knowledge and experience in Internet crime and technology law.

Ms. Strickler represents clients in these cutting-edge cases as well as those involving more traditional white collar crimes, such as tax evasion, money laundering, racketeering, international extradition and fraud.

Criminal Law

Drug Crimes, Fraud, Gun Crimes, Internet Crimes, Sex Crimes, Theft, Violent Crimes

White Collar Crime

• FaceTime
• Google Meet
• Skype
• FreeConferenceCall
• Microsoft Teams
• WhatsApp

• Free Consultation
  Free Confidential Consultation

California

State Bar of California

ID Number: 202469

Since 1999

Georgia

Since 1997

New York

New York State Office of Court Administration

ID Number: 4256434

Since 2004

Partner / Attorney

Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

1997 - Current

Emory University School of Law

J.D. (1997) | Law

1997

Honors: Outstanding Academic Record, Recognized by the Dean of Students

University of Delaware

B.A. (1991) | Criminal Justice

1991

Leader in Criminal Defense

Time Magazine

Rising Star Superlawyer

Atlanta Magazine

Top 100 Trial Lawyers

National Trial Lawyers

Rising Star Superlawyer

Atlanta Magazine

One of America's Top Criminal Defense Lawyers

Newsweek Magazine

International Bar Association

Professional Ethics Committee - Advisory Board Member

Current

Activities: Former Cyber Crime Subcommittee Member; Former Business Crime and Criminal Law Committees (Newsletter Coordinator); Former Criminal Law Committee (Co-Chair); Business Law International Journal (Board Member).

The Lawyers Club of Atlanta

Member

Current

American Trial Lawyers Association

Member

Current

Northern District of Georgia

Member

Current

Middle District of Georgia

Member

Current

Cybersecurity Guidelines

IBA

January 1, 2018

Cyber Crime, Crypto Currency, and Money Laundering: What Rules Apply & How to Fight Back, ABA 2022 Criminal Justice Section Global Paris White Collar Crime Institute, Paris, France

June 10, 2022

ABA

As the world’s enforcement bodies continue to build collaborative networks and share enforcement priorities, the speech explored trends from a global perspective.

After the Hack: A Data Breach Post-Game Show, Webinar

May 13, 2020

ITechLaw

Paralegal

The Philadelphia Institute

1991

Q. motion to continue arraignment & trial granted w/out opposition- does that mean case is going to trial w no plea deal?

July 7, 2021

A: There are a lot of reasons why this could occur, but, no it definitely does not mean a case is going to trial with no plea deal. One reason a motion to continue is filed could be that the AUSA is about to reindict with a superseding indictment and doesn't want to arraign defendant twice and waste court resources. Another reason is that there could be a plea deal in the works and one or both sides don't want any speedy trial time to accrue. Or, it could be a simple as someone is going out of town/doing a different trial and not ready to proceed at all at this time. The only way you can really tell on the pacer docket that a case is going to trial is if you see the R and R, and case is certified and ready for trial. And in reality, after a bunch more time as passed, you see a flurry of activity of filing voir dire, specially setting trial date etc. ... Read More

Q. Is the search warrant valid if it has the wrong address?

April 18, 2021

A: A lot depends on the specific circumstances surround the situation. If there is a valid issue with the search warrant, we can fight it by filing a motion to suppress in court and hope the judge will suppress whatever was seized during the search.

Q. When a residence is raided by law enforcement they leave behind a property sheet of items they took, at the top it says

March 1, 2021

A: I would advise that you contact a lawyer to attempt to get your items back. Since there was a search warrant executed where you live, it may mean that there is an active investigation and thus it may not be a good idea to speak to law enforcement without representation.

Charges could still very well be forthcoming. The government sometimes can take a full year after a search warrant is executed to indict.