A lawyer for over 30 years, Mark's extensive legal background representing large corporate entities and artists both established and emerging, as well as his work as a gigging musician, make him equally comfortable navigating the halls of Corporate America and the mustiest of music halls. Licensed to practice law in all the federal and state courts of Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina and Alabama, as well as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Mark is an alumnus of the University of Alabama (B.A.) and Cumberland School of Law (J.D.), and served two years as judicial law clerk to a federal judge. In addition to representing artists, Mark has represented many of the country’s largest financial institutions, most recently as a partner at Johnson & Freedman, LLC, a mid-size firm serving clients in Atlanta, Georgia. In 2016, he married a professor of art at Florida State University and moved to Tallahassee, where he continues to represent clients nationwide (in matters of federal law, such as trademark and copyright) within his principal practice areas.
- Business Law
- Entertainment & Sports
- Intellectual Property
- Free Consultation
Free initial consultation of approximately 30 minutes.
- Contingent Fees
I occasionally enter contingent fee arrangements, depending upon the subject matter.
- Rates, Retainers and Additional Information
I also perform certain services for a flat fee, such as routine contract preparation and review, copyright and trademark registrations, and corporate formations.
- North Carolina
- 4th Circuit
- English: Spoken, Written
- French: Written
- Mark A. Baker Law, LLC
- - Current
- Managing Partner, Bankruptcy Department
- Johnson & Freedman, L.L.C., Atlanta, GA
- Associate Attorney, Manager, Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Departments
- Law Offices of Mark Weber, P.C., Atlanta, GA
- Associate Attorney
- Gingold, Kaufman & Chaiken, Atlanta, GA
- Associate Attorney
- Schwall, Ruff & Goodman, Atlanta, GA
- Judicial Law Clerk
- Honorable L. Chandler Watson, Jr., U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Alabama
- Staff Attorney
- Legal Services Corporation of Alabama, Anniston, AL
- Cumberland School of Law, Samford University
- J.D. (1982)
- University of Alabama School of Law
- B.A. (1979) | English Literature
- Tennessee State Bar
- - Current
- North Carolina State Bar
- - Current
- Georgia State Bar
- - Current
- Atlanta Bar Association
- - Current
- Alabama State Bar
- - Current
- David Bowie: Star Man
- Paste Magazine
- Elvis Costello: My Aim Is True
- Paste Magazine
- Chapter 7 and 13 Bankruptcy practice
- WGUN?AM Radio, CBS Affiliate
- Careers in Entertainment Law
- Emory Law School
- Debtor/Creditor Law, Continuing Legal Education
- Georgia State University, College of Law
- Music & the Law
- Emory Law School
- Panel Participant
- Copyright for Artists
- Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts
- Opportunities for the Sole Practitioner in Entertainment Law
- Emory Law Student Sports and Entertainment Law Section
- Money Matters: Keys to Advising Clients During Foreclosure and Repossession Actions in Georgia
- National Business Institute
- Mark A. Baker's Website Profile
- Mark A. Baker Law, LLC Website
- Entertainment Attorney Blog
- You Want To Use Someone Else’s Service Mark On Your Goods? Think Twice In The Eleventh Circuit
9 February 2018
- Court Dismisses Former Dolphin’s Offensive Line Coach’s Defamation Claims
19 January 2018
- Could the Heirs of the Sculptor of the Stone Mountain Confederate Memorial Prevent Its Alteration?
25 August 2017
- POINTS TO PONDER IN AN MUSIC ARTIST-MANAGER CONTRACT
19 April 2017
- The New Author’s Range of Publishing Options
27 October 2016
- Talent Agreements for Reality TV Series – There’s A Hefty Price To Pay
13 September 2016
- More Tips for the Traveling Musician
20 May 2016
- Judge Denies Summary Judgment and Sends “Stairway to Heaven” Suit to Trial
12 May 2016
- I’m Back – And “Stairway to Heaven” Is Too
28 April 2016
- Q. I filed for Ch. 7 in the middle of a month. At the beginning of that month, I got a $2000/year raise, but filed
- A: I agree with your attorney's assessment, assuming, of course, that you make this disclosure at the 341 meeting. Following the meeting, there may be other matters to address by amendment, so it makes sense to address them all in a single amendment.
- Q. I live in Alabama and I was wondering if you can file on a car only and not other things.
- A: The answer to your question requires analysis of a number of variables that you haven't addressed, to determine whether you are eligible for chapter 7 relief (a so-called "fresh start," with discharge of all eligible debts) or would otherwise be required to file a chapter 13 case (which allows you to cure your contractual defaults and repay your creditors over 3-5 years). Regardless of the type bankruptcy for which you are eligible, you must schedule ALL of your debts, assets and income, together with other financial information, and you cannot pick and choose. Under both chapter 7 and chapter 13, there are provisions to allow you to pay for and retain a car, real estate and other assets, but the provisions are specific to each of the chapters for which you may be eligible. To understand your options better, I recommend you discuss your eligibility with a seasoned bankruptcy attorney in your area. Best of luck.
- Q. Does anyone know if the skit "Who on First" by Abbott & Costello is public domain or owned by their relatives.
- A: The copyright has PROBABLY fallen into the public domain, based upon case law. In a recent lawsuit decided by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, a playwright had used about 30 seconds of the "Who's On First?" skit in a Broadway show, "Hand of God." The heirs of Bud Abbott and Lou Costello, together with the movie studio, TCA, which claimed copyright to the film, filed suit claiming copyright infringement. The Second Circuit found that the usage was a not "fair use," but that the plaintiffs/heirs had failed to established that they held a valid copyright interest, and the case was dismissed. The TCA plaintiffs said that Abbott and Costello’s heirs received rights in the skit from Universal Pictures Corp. (UPC) in 1984. It appeared that the routine had been separately registered for Abbott and Costello in the U.S. Copyright Office in 1944, though not renewed in 1972, as required at that time for continued copyright protection. The appeals court held: “In sum, because plaintiffs fail plausibly to allege that (1) Abbott and Costello assigned their common law copyright [as an unpublished work] in Who’s on First? to UPC; (2) the Routine, as appropriated by defendants in Hand to God, was first created for UPC as a work-for-hire; or (3) the Routine so merged with the UPC movies in which it was performed as to become a unitary whole, we conclude that plaintiffs did not plead their possession of a valid copyright in the Routine, as required to pursue their infringement claim.” TCA Television Corp. v. McCollum, 839 F.3d 168 (2d Cir. 2016). The heirs then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the defendants argued in their certiorari brief that “the Second Circuit had announced a new rule of eligibility for copyright renewal under the 1909 [Copyright] Act, applied retroactively to a 1940 work — i.e., that the previously unpublished material did not become part of the movie’s unitary copyright for renewal purposes unless it was created solely for the movie. Nothing in the 1909 Act supports such a judge-made rule.” In other words, to be covered under the movie's copyright ("One Night In the Tropics," made in 1940), the material must have been created for the movie; but the "Who's On First?" skit was created prior to the movie, had been performed on the Kate Smith Radio Hour in 1938, and was separately registered for copyright by Abbott and Costello (but the copyright was not renewed). The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, thus leaving the Second Circuit decision standing. Thus, it seems settled that the "Who's On First?" skit has fallen into public domain.
- Q. Is it illegal to use a picture of bamm bamm from the Flintstones as part of a logo for a music recording label?
- A: Unless you have permission or a license to use a picture of Bamm-Bamm as part of your logo, it is likely that your unauthorized use will infringe upon the owner's (probably Hanna-Barbera or ABC) trademark or other rights and expose you to legal liability.
- Q. Can I legally sell a resource to accompany a novel study on an online store and refer to the actual title of the book?
- A: I'm not sure I understand your question. Please explain a little more. Thanks, Mark A. Baker
- Q. Can a brand name be trademarked by someone else if it has been registered as a legal entity in the State of Alabama?
- A: If the other party's use of the name has been trademarked through the USPTO, you may have an uphill battle. Much would depend upon the timing, although if your usage of the name commenced before the other party's use, and you can document this use, then there may be an avenue to proceed. Without all the relevant information, though, I cannot make a determination of whether you may have a way to challenge the other party's use of the name.
- Q. What is a derivative art work? If I do some additions to an existing art work of some artist and make a derivative.?
- A: Among other rights, the Copyright Act of 1976 (17 U.S. Code § 106) provides the copyright owner the exclusive right . . . “(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work * * *.” Derivative works are based on or derived from one or more already existing works. Copyright Office Circular 14 (https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf) is helpful in understanding the nature of a derivative work. It is critical to understand that the rights to make derivative works belong to the owner (or his licensee/assignee) of the copyright. You’ve asked, will your new work be exempted from copyright infringement because it is a “fair use” of the original? Unfortunately, there is no black and white test to determine with certainty whether a new work is a derivative of the original (and only the copyright owner may legally make a derivative work) or a fair use of the original, which is not a copyright infringement. There’s no better online resource to understanding the scope and limitations of the fair use doctrine than the Stanford University Libraries’ “Copyright and Fair Use” treatise (https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/). In the past several years, courts have tended to focus the inquiry into whether the original copyrighted work that was used has been “transformed” by adding new expression or meaning, or has been given value by creating new information, aesthetics, insights, and understandings. If your new work is not “transformative” of the original, then a court would likely find it to be a derivative work, which is an infringement of the copyright owner’s exclusive rights to make derivative works. The legal information herein should not be relied upon by you. But you should consult competent legal counsel for an opinion whether your new works are a fair use of an original copyright work.
- Q. My husband and I personal guaranteed (up to $25,000) on our daughters personal residence mortgage. The bank foreclosed
- A: Assuming that you have signed a personally guaranty of your daughter's mortgage loan, then it is likely that you have potential legal liability for the remaining deficiency following the foreclosure sale. However, in order for the mortgage lender to have the legal right to pursue you for that deficiency, it will have to file a lawsuit in the county where the property sits, or where one of the guarantors lives, and get a judgment against you for the remaining sums owed. Unless and until the mortgage lender obtains a deficiency judgment against you, it is not legally entitled to collect the deficiency. This advice is general and the particular facts of your situation may change the advice, so you should not rely solely on this advice. You should consult with an attorney of your choice to be sure that the facts of your situation meet the requirements of the law. Best of luck, Mark A. Baker
- Q. If I purchased music, can I sell a DVD with that music in the background?
- A: Your use of others' music as you describe would be considered copyright infringement. When you purchase and download a song from iTunes, you only have the right to personal use of the song, and not the right to "copy" of otherwise "distribute" it, which is what you're doing if you're adding music to video. Your intended use requires a master use license (to use the master recording) and a synchronization license (to sync the master recording to video) from the copyright holder, which may be difficult and expensive to acquire. You might consider locating license-free music to use with your video creations. Of course, it's likely these tunes are not familiar (although songs in the public domain may be familiar, even if old), but there will be no licensing issues. Best of luck!