John Michael Frick
Experienced North Texas Civil Trial and Appellate Attorney
John has been representing businesses and business people in the North Texas area for more than thirty years. He has tried numerous cases at various levels of the judicial system, including federal district court and state district court. He has presented appeals to the Supreme Court of Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and ten of the fourteen intermediate courts of appeal in Texas. He has arbitrated cases before the American Arbitration Association and JAMS, Inc. In addition to his trial practice, John is a trained mediator and summary jury trial judge. As a result of displaying a high degree of skill, competence, and professionalism, he has earned an AV-Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
John received his law degree from SMU School of Law in 1988, where he served as an Associate Editor for the Southwestern Law Journal. While still in law school, he successfully presented an appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas through the school’s civil clinic program, resulting in a published opinion reversing the lower court. He also completed his first jury trial through the school’s clinic program.
After graduating from law school, John served a judicial clerkship as briefing attorney for the Honorable Gordon H. Rowe, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. There, John had the pleasure of working with future Supreme Court of Texas Justices Nathan Hecht, Craig Enoch, and James Baker.
As a seasoned trial lawyer, John continues to maintain a high level of practice. He has represented clients in cases reported in the Wall Street Journal and Dallas Morning News, as well as ones featured on local news broadcasts and the national news program, Nightline. His civil trial practice includes representation in both state and federal court and encompasses a wide range of areas.
- Business Law
- Business Contracts, Business Formation, Business Litigation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Partnership & Shareholder Disputes
- Appeals & Appellate
- Civil Appeals, Federal Appeals
- Construction Law
- Construction Contracts, Construction Defects, Construction Liens, Construction Litigation
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Business - Arbitration/Mediation, Family - Arbitration/Mediation
- Personal Injury
- Construction Accidents, Premises Liability, Wrongful Death
- Divorce
- Contested Divorce, Property Division
- Insurance Claims
- Bad Faith Insurance, Business Insurance, Property Insurance
- Civil Litigation
- Contract Litigation
- Commercial Litigation
- Real Estate Litigation
- Professional Liability
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- WebEx
-
Credit Cards Accepted
Visa & Mastercard Only -
Rates, Retainers and Additional Information
Provides 90-minute initial consultation for a flat fee of $500. Does not typically work on a contingency fee. Usually requires a retainer.
- Texas
- State Bar of Texas
- ID Number: 07455200
-
- 5th Circuit
-
- English
- Partner
- Reid, Dennis & Frick, PC
- - Current
- Member
- Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC
- -
- Partner
- Bennett, Weston LaJone & Turner, P.C.
- -
- Senior Attorney
- Reid & Dennis, PC
- -
- Solo Practitioner
- Law Offices of John M. Frick
- -
- Partner
- Mills, Presby & Associates, L.L.P.
- -
- Associate
- Godwin & Carlton, P.C.
- -
- Briefing Attorney
- Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
- -
- SMU Dedman School of Law
- Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.)
-
- Southern Methodist University
- B.S. (1985) | Political Science
- -
- Honors: Summa Cum Laude
-
- Southern Methodist University
- B.A. (1985) | Psychology
- -
- Honors: Summa Cum Laude
-
- AV-Preeminent
- Martindale-Hubbell
- For over 100 years, the Bar Register has been a unique guide to the legal community's most eminent professionals. It includes only those select law practices that have earned the highest rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory and have been designated by their colleagues as preeminent in their field. The 2022 Bar Register contains over 14,000 member listings out of more than 1.3 million attorneys in the United States.
- Texas State Bar # 07455200
- Member
- - Current
-
- Board-Certified, Civil Trial Law
- Texas Board of Legal Specialization
- Website
- Reid, Dennis & Frick, PC
- Q. How to change name on property deed after remarriage in Texas without a death certificate.
- A: If the property is your separate property (i.e. it was not acquired by you during your previous marriage) and the deed is currently in your sole name (i.e. your previous husband's name is not on the deed), you can sign a new deed in your to yourself in your new name before a notary public.
While it is not legally necessary to do so because you are, after all, the same person, that will change the official legal ownership records into your new name.
I strongly recommend not adding your new husband's name unless it is your intent to make a gift to him of 50% of the property. It is in your best interest to maintain your separate property in your sole name.
- Q. Can I sue Spirit Airlines for emotional distress after a turbulent flight to Dallas?
- A: No, you can't.
There is a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress but, given the admittedly high winds, I doubt you could convince anyone that the pilot's conduct was "extreme and outrageous" or was "intentional" or "reckless."
There is no cause of action recognized for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Twyman v. Twyman, 855 S.W.2d 619 (Tex. 1993); Boyles v. Kerr, 855 S.W.2d 593 (Tex. 1993). There has been no indication since 1993 of the courts changing their minds. Any such cause of action would have to argue for changing the law, and your facts aren't the best for doing that.
- Q. Options if my attorney and assistant provided inadequate representation in SAPCR case.
- A: When an attorney withdraws, "ineffective communication" is often used as the reason instead of the "real reason" particularly when the "real reason" may be prejudicial to the client. Generally, attorneys should avoid prejudicing their client when they withdraw from a case.
The "real reason" may very well fall into the very broad definition of the term "ineffective communication" which may include: the client not following the attorney's recommendations, not complying with discovery obligations, not following court orders, not timely providing information in the discovery process or to the attorney, insisting that the attorney take a position ... Read More
