(414) 563-7453Tap to Call This Lawyer
Brady R. Henderson
Awarding-winning litigator with experience in high-profile and high stakes cases
Badges
Claimed Lawyer ProfileOffers Video ConferencingQ&AResponsive Law
Practice Areas
- Civil Rights
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Discrimination, Employment, Fair Housing, Police Misconduct, Privacy Law
- Appeals & Appellate
- Civil Appeals, Federal Appeals
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Business - Arbitration/Mediation, Consumer - Arbitration/Mediation, Family - Arbitration/Mediation
- Education Law
- Gov & Administrative Law
- Administrative Law, Election Law, Government Contracts, Government Finance, Legislative & Government Affairs
- Municipal Law
- Criminal Law
- Criminal Appeals, Drug Crimes, Expungement, Fraud, Gun Crimes, Internet Crimes, Sex Crimes, Theft, Violent Crimes
- Cannabis & Marijuana Law
- Marijuana Business Formation, Medical Marijuana
- Business Law
- Business Contracts, Business Dissolution, Business Finance, Business Formation, Business Litigation, Franchising, Mergers & Acquisitions, Partnership & Shareholder Disputes
Video Conferencing
- Google Meet
- Skype
- Zoom
Fees
- Not Currently Accepting Clients
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
- Oklahoma
- Oklahoma Bar Association
- ID Number: 21212
-
- Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Court System
- ID Number: 1116435
-
- 7th Circuit
-
- 10th Circuit
- ID Number: N/A
-
- U.S. Supreme Court
- ID Number: 295477
-
Languages
- English: Spoken, Written
Professional Experience
- Legal Director
- ACLU of Oklahoma
- -
- Assistant District Attorney
- Cleveland County District Attorney
- -
Education
- University of Oklahoma College of Law
- J.D. (2006) | Constitutional Law
- -
- Honors: American Jurisprudence Award - Constitutional Law American Jurisprudence Award - Trial Techniques
- Activities: Oklahoma Journal of Law & Technology
-
- University of Oklahoma
- B.A. (2003) | Letters; Political Science
- -
- Honors: Phi Beta Kappa, National Merit Scholar
-
Awards
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg Award
- ACLU of Oklahoma
- Carter Bradley First Amendment Award
- Society of Professional Journalists - Okla. Chapter
- Excellence in Action against Domestic Violence
- Oklahoma Attorney General
Professional Associations
- State Bar of Wisconsin # 1116435
- Member
- Current
-
- Oklahoma Bar Association # 21212
- Member
- Current
-
Websites & Blogs
- Website
- Cream City Law, LLC
Legal Answers
3 Questions Answered
- Q. If a knock and announce warrant was excuted without announcement is it still valid?
- A: In practical terms, the failure of officers to "knock and announce" does not usually mean that evidence taken or discovered from serving the warrant can be suppressed or excluded. The US Supreme Court took up this question in a case called Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), and affirmed that with rare exceptions, a failure to knock and announce does not allow a court to throw out evidence seized.
However, there are definitely many circumstances in which a failure to knock and announce can be the basis of a tort or civil rights lawsuit, but this will usually be limited to damage or injuries resulting from the failure to knock and announce. For example, a law enforcement agency ... Read More
- Q. Just clarifying that if my dad loses his assistance thru inclusa as per STATE STATUTE 55.02(2) and SINCE HE IS in prote
- A: Both Wisconsin law and federal law provide a right for a person being cared for due to a disability to be given the least restrictive placement. Sometimes court battles arise because that person, the person's guardian or family and the state disagree as to what placement is required. If you are your father's guardian, the state should not be able to do much here without your consent, or at least giving you notice of what they intend to do and an opportunity to be heard.
If things have been done without you being in the loop, or you are concerned about that happening in the near future, it could be important to consult further with an attorney here about legal options for what to ... Read More
- Q. Is implied consent constitutional why or why not?
- A: The short answer is yes. Courts have consistently upheld implied consent testing against constitutional challenges. At least in theory, the subject person's "consent" for the alcohol test is given when they become (or remain) a licensed driver, such that the test does not constitute an illegal involuntary search. As many driver's ed instructors love saying: "Driving is a privilege, not a right." The legality of Implied Consent laws is based largely on that concept, which is legally correct, but not quite the whole story.
Just because the concept of Implied Consent is constitutional does NOT mean that every test or consequence for a test refusal is constitutional. ... Read More
Contact & Map
