Steven Willock

Steven Willock

  • Real Estate Law, Business Law
  • Arizona, California, Washington
Review This Lawyer
Lawyer Rating and Reviews
Legal Knowledge
5.0/5.0
Legal Analysis
5.0/5.0
Communication Skills
5.0/5.0
Ethics and Professionalism
5.0/5.0
Rating: 10 Lawyer Rating - 10 out of 10
Steve is my law partner and I would not tie my name to somebody who I did not think was the best at what they do. He is one of the smartest individuals I have ever met, and has the ability to grasp complex legal theories. What makes him particularly unique is his ability to then explain this to clients effectively.
Badges
Claimed Lawyer ProfileQ&ASocial MediaResponsive Law
Biography

Steve Willock is a transactional attorney with over 20 years of experience successfully representing a wide array of real estate and business clients.

Although the principal focus of Steve’s practice is on real estate transactional matters, over the course of his career, Steve has been honored to serve as ongoing general counsel (both in-house and as outside counsel) to a variety of business clients, real estate developers, municipalities, regional businesses, and Fortune 500 companies. In this role, Steve served as trusted legal advisor and the first point of contact whenever any new legal issue arises. As a result, Steve has developed a broad base of knowledge and experience in additional legal areas that are critical to the operation and protection of his clients’ business and financial interests, such as employment law, secured financing, intellectual property, litigation management, bankruptcy, insolvency, and creditors’ rights.

Steve has deep roots in both California and Washington State and is licensed to practice in both jurisdictions.

Practice Areas
Real Estate Law
Commercial Real Estate, Condominiums, Easements, Eminent Domain, Homeowners Association, Land Use & Zoning, Mortgages
Business Law
Business Contracts, Business Dissolution, Business Finance, Business Formation, Franchising, Mergers & Acquisitions
Fees
  • Free Consultation
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
Arizona
State Bar of Arizona
ID Number: 038168
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
California
State Bar of California
ID Number: 206207
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
Washington
Washington State Bar Association
ID Number: 47655
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
9th Circuit
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
Languages
  • English: Spoken, Written
Professional Experience
Attorney
Sandman Savrann, LLP
- Current
Partner
Van Ness Feldman LLP
-
Of Counsel
Van Ness Feldman LLP
-
Attorney / Partner
The Narrows Law Group
-
General Counsel
Point Ruston/MC Constructions
-
Education
University of California - San Diego
B.A. | Economics
Honors: with honors
University of California - San Diego Logo
University of California, Davis, School of Law
J.D. | Law
University of California, Davis, School of Law Logo
Professional Associations
Tacoma Pierce County Bar Association
Member
Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
King County Bar Association
Member
Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Washington State Bar Association
Member
- Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
California State Bar  # 206207
Member
- Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Legal Answers
1 Questions Answered
Q. My son and daughter own a piece of property in Wa. State, 50% each. My daughter signed her 50% over to me with a quite
A: Assuming the quit claim deed conveying your daughter's 50% interest to you complies with the statutory requirements for a quit claim deed under Washington law, the deed would be a legal document enforceable against your daughter even if it has not been recorded. A deed does not need to be recorded in Washington State to be a valid legal document. On the other hand, the benefit of recording the quit claim deed is to protect your ownership interest in the property against third parties who claim an interest in the property and have no actual knowledge that your daughter transferred her interest to you. For instance (and this may get a bit confusing), if an otherwise valid quit claim deed is not recorded, it is possible for the original transferor to either re-sell the same 50% interest to a third party or to use that interest as security for a loan even after the interest was sold or transferred to you. Under these circumstances, if the buyer or lender did not have knowledge of the transfer when they purchased or mortgaged the property, and if the buyer or lender then records their deed (or, if applicable, deed of trust), then the transfer made via the original unrecorded quit claim deed may be void as against the rights of the subsequent buyer or lender. Thus, it is always advisable to record a deed as soon as possible even though that deed is enforceable against the transferor without the necessity of recording.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, please note that there may be relevant facts that would have an impact on your rights, and you should not interpret the foregoing as legal advice. Only an attorney who has had a chance to inquire about all relevant facts and to review all relevant documents can provide you with competent legal advice. Therefore, I would suggest that you consult with a local real estate attorney to evaluate your matter.
... Read More
View More Answers
Toggle tool

There are no recently viewed profiles.

There are no saved profiles.

There are no profiles to compare.